Nusbaum Parrino

Nusbaum & Parrino P.C. is pleased to announce that principals Edward Nusbaum and Thomas P. Parrino were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® 2012 in the field . . .

Nusbaum & Parrino P.C. is pleased to announce that Edward Nusbaum and Thomas P. Parrino were named to the 2011 edition of Best Lawyers in the New York Area by New York Magazine in the area of Family Law. . . .

Nusbaum & Parrino P.C. is pleased to announce that Edward Nusbaum and Thomas P. Parrino were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2011 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in the area of Family . . .

Nusbaum & Parrino P.C. is pleased to announce that Edward Nusbaum and Thomas P. Parrino were named to the 2011 “Connecticut Super Lawyers” list in the area of Family Law and featured in a special supplement . . .

Nusbaum & Parrino P.C. is pleased to announce that Edward Nusbaum and Thomas P. Parrino were named to the 2010 “New England Super Lawyers” list published in the November 2010 issue of New England Super . . .

In an attempt to reduce the alimony he was ordered to pay as a result of our advocacy for our client at the prior trial, the former husband petitioned that his financial circumstances had so significantly . . .

At trial and on appeal, in a post-judgment hearing, our client’s ex-husband asserted that an oral agreement with our client relieved the ex-husband from paying child support. At the hearing, we asserted . . .

In a lengthy and complex hearing that resulted in the highest monthly amount of temporary alimony awarded in a reported decision by any court in the United States, we presented a convincing, detailed . . .

At trial and on appeal, we submitted motions on our client’s behalf asserting that the husband was secreting assets overseas; the husband caused the wife excessive legal fees by hiding those assets and . . .

At trial and on appeal, we argued on behalf of our client that the Trial Court improperly concluded that the parties' prenuptial agreement was unenforceable. In an opinion that substantially resembled . . .

At trial and on appeal, we argued that certain unvested stock options awarded to our client were not part of the marital estate because the stock options were awarded to the husband solely for future . . .

After the divorce, our client’s daughter received treatment for bulimia and anorexia. The father refused to pay for the treatment, arguing that the psychological services were not medical services that . . .